Interesting article in the Good Weekend today. All about 'positive psychology', a developing practice where psychologists and therapists are focusing their energies on uncovering those attitudes and environments which lead to feelings of happiness as opposed to feelings of sadness and depression. Kinda like a preventative psychology, a move away from the common practice of dealing with the problem (like finding treatments for depression) and instead helping people create lives where happiness and contentment are fostered in an effective and ongoing way. Their initial findings indicate that helping others (surprise surprise) is an important element in becoming happy, although the ultimate measure of ones approach to life is still centred on the self: I help others because it makes me feel good. Still, it got me thinking...
As the article pointed out, the pursuit of happiness has always been a focus of psychology; it's just that now some practitioners are being a little more proactive in helping people 'learn happiness' rather than just helping them to not be as sad as they might be. But the fact that happiness has always been a concern of psychology (and philosophy) indicates that it has always been a concern of humanity. So reading this article I was left wondering: "Surely as the Church we must have profound and helpful things to say about happiness and contentment. Surely we can provide some kind of answer to the questions that are driving those looking for answers in 'positive psychology'". It was interesting to note that those interviewed in the article didn't want to provide a 'religious' answer to happiness (even though religious ideas formed part of their research data). But can't we afford to be a bit more positive about what a NT faith can offer the individual and society in terms of ideas about happiness?
I suspect that many churches have failed to really hit this squarely on the head. Some speak a lot about happiness and fulfilling your potential but do so in a theologically naive way. It is my contention that such an approach only causes damage in the long run. Others seem to view NT faith in a way which uses lots of negative expressions "The Gospel is about our sin; the first thing to say about humanity is about how sinful we are; church is all about service and duty". It is fast becoming my view that this approach is also theologically naive, and can truncate our enjoyment of the Christian life while exposing the sad fact that we don't actually have much too say about happiness.
So this is what I'm planning to do. I want to start to explore and build up a theology of happiness. I feel that in doing so not only will we enrich the spiritual lives of our churches but we will also open up another avenue into the world of those outside our communities. People want to be happy. Surely we can say something to them which goes beyond the glib soundbites of an underdeveloped theology. The first step will be to put some theological pegs in the ground...
10 points for the first to tell me what this picture is of.
Saturday, August 11, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
19 comments:
mate, that's Sigmund Freud's couch.
It's all in Augustine, mate.
But, start off with Aristotle and his Ethics: which talk of the 'eudamonistic' life - ie, the happy life. That's Augie's reference point.
Then I think Luther's sanctification of every day life is kind of crucial too.
great topic!
Also: the biblical idea of 'blessing'. The sermon on the mount is a sermon on how to be happy...
ie, hunger and thirst for righteousness.
Oh, and Wisdom of course...
wow, great topic.
As I read this, I though, "What a great IiT topic". But you're done on that account.
-seumas
Thanks for posting Marty,
Random thoughts on the theology of happiness:
Happiness can not be attained if it's the goal. Happiness is a byproduct. It only comes to you in a secondary way when you are restored in God.
Those doing "positive psychology" need to be self-deceptive or falsely optimistic (since inner attitudes and environment are bleak without God). The "happiness and contentment" that they seek is really the joy that God offers in salvation through Jesus; and this will be allusive so long as they reject God.
Furthermore, Biblical joy is counter-cultural and well disguised, since it's packaged in hope and suffering. (I'm thinking of 1 Peter 1:3-12, particularly (8-9)
"Though you have not seen him, you love him; and even though you do not see him now, you believe in him and are filled with an inexpressible and glorious joy, for you are receiving the goal of your faith, the salvation of your souls."
... need to think a bit more about the correlation between suffering and joy in the rest of the Bible.
Sorry for long post!
David Ould: Good job
MPJ: Good to see you also think the Bible is a source! What does Salman have to say???
Jeltzz: I think almost every blog entry has IiT paper in it. Maybe I'll do one on food...
Honoria: Agreed on the counter-cultural idea, and am planning to post about it. I do think that non-believers can be happy though. It's a different happiness to us, but God does send the rain on the righteous as well as the wicked.
looking forward to reading more marty. where do you reckon you would start?
But would completing a theology of happiness make you happy?
"Happiness isn't something you experience; it's something you remember." - Oscar Levant
Hey Martin
Piper's done a lot on this stuff in his exporation of Christian hedonism - finding joy in God, his glory and goodness. It interesting that in 1 Cor 2 where Paul is speaking of the Lord of Glory crucified as God's wisdom for the mature- it is couched in terms of a mystery fore ordained 'for our glory'. I wonder if a theology of happiness is another way of speaking about a theology of 'our glory' ?
My favourite little expression atthe moment comes from the PIper video link on my blog whic hwould be a great subtile for your book on happiness...'God is enough' ...
Hey Marty
I'm working on a book called How to Live Forever/The Long Life Equation (probably more overtly anti-christian interest than some of the other dodgier content I work on) which, sourced from all sorts of scientific journals, reckons that being happy adds a further 9 years to your lifespan...(the book is 100 factors that add or subtract years from your life...). Happiness comes in with one of the highest additions...
Had to read this twice and still don't think i get all the nuances...
Interesting comment about helping others ultimately stemming from a desire to satisfy self...got me thinking about how this relates (or is different) to the Christian's call to serve others...
I think this topic is avoided in some Christian circles because of the empty promises happiness offers. Often we think "If I could just feel happy everything will be ok". We know this is not true. Happiness is elusive and should not be the end - as it is in Buddhism. I think honoria is on to a lot of good points in her random musings.
Will you address the difference between joy and happiness? Is happiness rather 'us' or 'me' focused and joy more Christ focused? Does Christ ever really promise happiness? Is there happiness in persecution, suffering, losing family...? There can be a deeply satisfying joy amongst the pain but happiness seems so elusive and fleeting.
Because of my skepticism re promises of happiness, I'm looking forward to your thesis.
pegs in the ground...
or some kites in the sky?
Is the picture your study?
Post...
Part II? Please?
Isn't the photo of Mitchell's house interior of Mitchell library fame?
as for happiness: if you seek it, you may not get it because it is a by-product.
I recall watching a bit of the "happiness" conference on Compass - and one speaker said that there is a whole lot of industries out out there making us feel discontent, and that their product is the answer (to making you happy).
MJ: Aristotle's "eudaimonia" is about living a blessed [ie having a good (eu) spirit(daimon) life], ie good/worthwhile life. ie a bit more moral than our normal concept of "happiness"...I think. I did uni essay on the Nichomachean Ethics ch 7 - frienship is big for Aristotle.
oops...you already said Dave Ould was right re Freud's couch...
Hi Marty,
It appears that you are no longer talkin' to us. Well, not via this blog anyway.
Hi Marty.
Please include something to say to all those people who keep expecting me to nicely agree that we all "just want our children to be happy". I've yet to come up with something suitably un-cranky sounding and brief.
Saying 'no' and running away fast isn't a good look!
Post a Comment